04/30 Unfinished Easter
Home Up

Mystic Congregational Church, UCC

Mystic, Connecticut

Sermon from April 30, 2006

“Unfinished Easter”

Rev. Patricia L. Liberty

Scriptures:

Acts 3:2-19

Luke 24:36b-49

Of all the ways the risen Christ may have chosen to greet his disciples when he suddenly appeared in their midst, “hello” doesn’t appear anywhere or whatever the first-century equivalent of that might have been.  In fact, the whole conversation is just a little bit curious, if not downright odd, when you think about it.

The peculiar sequence of the interchange is heightened when you consider that Jesus just appears in their midst, bypassing the usual way one enters a room:  via the door.  There was no knocking, no announcement, no peeking in the window to see if they were home.  He just appears in their midst, seemingly like 5th year students at Hogwart’s learning to apparate.

Then, the first word out of his mouth is not “Hello”, or “What’s up, how are you” but “Peace”.  I suppose that was more helpful since the disciples were a little edgy to begin with, and having a supposedly dead person appear in their midst probably added to their marginally controlled confusion and anxiety.  Of course, if we want to be biblically accurate, Jesus’ showing up and saying, “Peace be to you” does follow his own admonition to greet any house one enters with a blessing of peace. (Luke 10:5-6).  So to say that the disciples were a little thunderstruck is probably an understatement.

But for us, it’s a little different.  We have heard these stories for so long that it’s hard to be surprised by them.  Not only do we know what’s going to happen, but we also know about biology.  Being people of modernity, it’s easy to bracket the resurrection appearances as either quaint tales of antiquity or allegorical yarns woven with strands of truth, central to our faith but not to be taken literally.  After all, rising from the dead is not scientific.  There must be another explanation.

One of the things that we share with the earliest disciples is confusion about the resurrection.  The writer or Luke's Gospel minces no words when clueing us in that the disciples were not only startled but terrified as well.  As post-modern Christians, we're not likely to be terrified but we are, for the most part, no more certain what to make of it than they were.  We have trouble sorting it all out.  Like them, we are left make meaning out of this mysterious and uncertain series of events.  This resurrection account from the end of Luke’s Gospel organizes around a few things to help us out just a little bit.

First, Jesus shows them his hands and feet.  Barbara Brown Taylor writes, “One of the most peculiar things about Luke’s resurrection story is the way Jesus identifies himself to his friends.  ‘Look at my hands and my feet,’ he says to his frightened, doubtful disciples.  They are shaking in their sandals.  They are wondering if they are having a group hallucination when he offers them four sure proofs that he is who they think he is:  two hands and two feet; ten fingers and ten toes which could belong to one else but him.  … Isn’t it a peculiar way to identify himself?”  When I hope someone will remember me or recognize me, I am not apt to jump out of my shoes and invite them to have a gander at my feet. (Home by Another Way, page 119). 

It’s not just the message that it’s not a ghost they are seeing that readers are supposed to get, though that is important, too.  What Jesus is really calling attention to are his wounds.  That’s what we’re supposed to notice.  It’s our first breadcrumb on the path to insight about the resurrection that we can easily follow.

Jesus tells them to look at his wounds.  He has to tell them because looking at wounds is not something most folks do of their own accord (maybe, doctors and nurses but not the rest of us).  When we see wounds of any kind, our first tendency is to look away, to avert our gaze.

The man who weeps in the hospital lobby all by himself, the homeless woman who shuffles past us as make our way from shop to shop, or even, for that matter, our own brokenness that stammers out in whatever it is that we are or fail to be for better or for worse.  We are all a mess of contradictions, a jumble of the good the not so good, a smattering of fear and faith, and there are countless moments when our slip hangs below the hem of our days.  We are a wounded lot.

When Jesus comes back, his wounds are still visible, changed but still visible.  It is one of the greatest joys of the resurrection—healing is possible, scars are acceptable, victory is not the same as perfection. 

Jesus tells them to look at his wounds.  They are part and parcel to who is he is now just as much as a few days ago.  His new life is very much connected to his suffering and his  suffering has been transformed.  He’s not just proving to his doubting disciples that it’s really him; he’s pointing to a central truth about ministry. 

We are, all of us, wounded healers.  Our greatest strengths will always grow out of our deepest pains, our greatest doubt, our most profound fears.  Psychology calls it integration.  The risen Christ says, “Look here at my hands and feet” so we can look at the places of our own wounds with the promise of similar healing.

The second bread crumb falls on the 41st verse where Jesus asks for some broiled fish and eats in their presence.  While I would like to think that this is included in the story as a way of blessing our penchant for potluck suppers in the Congregational tradition, alas, there is absolutely nothing in the text to suggest that that is a faithful rendering.  It’s actually a whole lot more profound than that.

Here’s where a little history may be helpful.  I’ll try and keep it brief and not too painful.  You see, trying to get a grip on the resurrection was a big thing for the early Christians, and it’s not too hard to imagine that people came up with lots of different ways of understanding it.   As the old joke goes, ask three Christians about just about anything and you get five opinions.  Some things never change and it was true in the first century. Among the more popular explanations for the resurrection toward the end of the first century—this was heavily influenced by the secular philosophies around Christianity—was the notion that Jesus was a disembodied spirit, a ghost.  It was problematic, but not necessarily for the reasons that you might think.

This whole notion that Jesus was a ghost was connected to a heresy of the early church called docetism which held that Jesus only SEEMED to be human.  After his seeming birth, came his seeming life, came his seeming ministry, and finally his seeming death.  For the Docetists, it was all an illusion.  Going along with that belief system was the notion that nothing in this life mattered because none of it was real.  People were just passing through on their way to something better.  It was the first-century precursor to “pie in the sky when we die by and by” notion.

There are a lots of reasons why that was problematic, but the one that Jesus focuses on here is that it undercuts any sense of mission that the early church was developing.  If we’re just passing through and the sufferings of this life are just illusion, then there is no need to care for another, no need to alleviate human suffering, no need to love one another, no need to tend to the planet, no value in the loving relationships we spend a life time trying to build.  It is counter to the very essence of the Judeo-Christian tradition.  The economic, physical and political needs of human beings, the commands to do justice, love mercy and walk humbly with our God are the very cornerstones of the Judeo-Christian faith, to all that Jesus taught and believed and lived and died for.

If it was all just an illusion, then where does one plant mission?  So, the risen Christ appearing in the flesh and not as a ghost was central to the early church’s understanding of mission.  Coming right on the heels of that, Jesus says, “You are witnesses to these things.”  It makes the connection between what’s real and what we’re supposed to now do about that.  There is a progression from proof, such as it was, to the commissioning.  Go teach and preach and make it known.  The commission is to go.

But the good news is we don’t have to have it all together, that we don’t have to have it all figured out.  If the disciples waited till they had the resurrection all figured out, to this day, none of us would be doing much of anything.  The best news of all comes right at the very end—that is that we don't have to do it on our own.  There is a promise of presence and power and peace to undergird the disciples of every age in their work.

While the risen Christ is clear about their commission, he's also very clear that they aren't quite ready yet and tells them to wait for the Holy Spirit.  That Holy Spirit comes not just on the day of Pentecost, that great holiday.  It comes in your life and mind at all kinds of different times, when the word becomes alive, when we discover some new energy mission and ministry, when we feel a passion to go out and do something and be a part of something that witnesses to the goodness of God.

Unfinished Easter is finished a little bit at a time in your life and mine when, strengthened with the spirit, we bear witness to the life God dreams for creation and for all who are a part of it—around the table at the Soup Kitchen, around our own kitchen table, around the communion table, in deeds of compassion and care and mercy and peace, in moments of witness that come in the face of what is wrong, when we stand with moral courage instead of fear.  Unfinished Easter, then, becomes just a little more finished.

So, celebrate Unfinished Easter.  Write your own ending as you bear witness to the resurrection.  Alleluia and Amen.